Greetings,
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > Push, thanks again!
>
> Why'd you only change HEAD? Isn't the test equally fragile in the
> back branches?
We hadn't had any complaints about it and so I wasn't sure if it was
useful to back-patch it. I'm happy to do so though.
Thanks,
Stephen