Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
Дата
Msg-id ZAWZ+6oc8Sp1lyWQ@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
>> wanted for 3rd party code.  As an example, here's Pavel's code in
>> plpgsql_check
>> extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
>> compatibility):
>> https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205

I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
for external consumption.  Let's first wait a bit and see if others
have any kind of objections or comments.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Luzanov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM