Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
От | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZA+Bpk/6LcYiUXnh@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 03:02:29PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Justin Pryzby (pryzby@telsasoft.com) wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:34:10AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > * Nathan Bossart (nathandbossart@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:13:17AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:32:56PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:18:52PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > > > >>> I'm curious why you chose to make this a string instead of an enum. There > > > > >>> might be little practical difference, but since there are only three > > > > >>> possible values, I wonder if it'd be better form to make it an enum. > > > > >> > > > > >> It takes more code to write as an enum - see 002.txt. I'm not convinced > > > > >> this is better. > > > > >> > > > > >> But your comment made me fix its <type>, and reconsider the strings, > > > > >> which I changed to active={unknown/true/false} rather than {unk/on/off}. > > > > >> It could also be active={unknown/yes/no}... > > > > > > > > > > I think unknown/true/false is fine. I'm okay with using a string if no one > > > > > else thinks it should be an enum (or a bool). > > > > > > > > There's been no response for this, so I guess we can proceed with a string > > > > GUC. > > > > > > Just happened to see this and I'm not really a fan of this being a > > > string when it's pretty clear that's not what it actually is. > > > > I don't understand what you mean by that. > > Why do you say it isn't a string ? > > Because it's clearly a yes/no, either the server is currently running > with huge pages, or it isn't. That's the definition of a boolean. I originally implemented it as a boolean, and I changed it in response to the feedback that postgres -C huge_pages_active should return "unknown". > > Is there an agreement to use a function, instead ? Alvaro was -1 on using a function Andres is +0 (?) Nathan is +1 Stephen is +1 I'm -0.5, but I reimplemented it as a function. I hope that helps it to progress. Please include a suggestion if there's better place for the function or global var. -- Justin
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: