Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Z4p-5R34LHYGO90V@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables
Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > pá 17. 1. 2025 v 16:35 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal: > > So this feature would be like global GUC variables, with permission > control? > > + types and domain type check - holds data in binary form - there are not > conversions binary, text > + it is declared - so less space for misuse is there. Custom GUC are absolutely > tolerant > + it is a fully database object, only owner can alter it, and event triggers > are supported, sinval > + possibility to set mutability, default value Okay, good summary. Now, can people give feedback that they would want this committed to PostgreSQL? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: