Re: [PATCH] doc/queries.sgml: add missing comma

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 02:18:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:58:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 18.08.22 20:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Thus:
> > > > Strictly speaking, this process is iteration, but <literal>RECURSIVE</literal>
> > > > is the terminology chosen by the SQL standards committee."
> > > > 
> > > > Because the above sounds just fine, I'd argue that if one does leave "not
> > > > recursion" it should be set off by a comma.
> > > I went with new wording, which should make this even clearer;  patch
> > > attached.
> > 
> > I think this whole note is a bit misleading, like the SQL people don't know
> > what recursion is.  The point is that the query is defined recursively.  The
> > evaluation process is iterative.  Those two are not contradictions.
> 
> Okay, makes sense.  Here is an updated patch.

Patch applied back to PG 10.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Indecision is a decision.  Inaction is an action.  Mark Batterson