Re: Tracking last scan time
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tracking last scan time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YxCfr+f0sDIZUUe4@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tracking last scan time (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tracking last scan time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 09:46:59AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Wow. I was just thinking you need second-level accuracy, which must be > cheap somewhere. > > > Second-level accuracy would indeed be fine for this. Frankly, for my use case > just the date would be enough, but I can imagine people wanting greater > accuracy than that. > > And yes, I was very surprised by the timing results I got as well. I guess it's > a quirk of macOS - on a Linux box I get ~4s for gettimeofday() and ~1s for time > (). i think we lose 95% of our users if we require it to be enabled so let's work to find a way it can be always enabled. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: