Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Ypx1JTdupnDYjF+T@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 09:24:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Well, another error that could happen in the early code paths is > EACCES on a custom socket directory specified, and we'd still face the > same problem on a follow-up restart. Using a sub-directory structure > as Daniel and Tom mention would address all that (if ignoring EEXIST > for the BASE_OUTPUTDIR), removing any existing content from the base > path when not using --retain. This comes with the disadvantage of > bloating the disk on repeated errors, but this last bit would not > really be a huge problem, I guess, as it could be more useful to keep > the error information around. I have been toying with the idea of a sub-directory named with a timestamp (Unix time, like log_line_prefix's %n but this could be any format) under pg_upgrade_output.d/ and finished with the attached. The logs are removed from the root path when --check is used without --retain, like for a non-check command. I have added a set of tests to provide some coverage for the whole: - Failure of --check where the binary path does not exist, and pg_upgrade_output.d/ is not removed. - Follow-up run of pg_upgrade --check, where pg_upgrade_output.d/ is removed. - Check that pg_upgrade_output.d/ is also removed after the main upgrade command completes. The logic in charge of cleaning up the logs has been moved to a single routine, aka cleanup_logs(). Thoughts? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: