Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YplnGNzSivpAePPl@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 05:12:49PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > ... > > > My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but > > rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the > > direction the community wants to go. > > The purpose of posting the POC patch was certainly not to present a > fait accompli design/implementation. > > We wanted to solicit some community feedback about the desirability of > the feature, but because LRG is complicated to describe we felt that > having a basic functional POC might help to better understand the > proposal. Also, we thought the ability to experiment with the proposed > API could help people to decide whether LRG is something worth > pursuing or not. I don't think the POC is helping, and I am not sure we really want to support this style of architecture due to its complexity vs other options. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: