Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YpYg608FcI+knMTw@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:32:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > You still have not answered my question above. "Without these features, > > > what workload would this help with?" You have only explained how the > > > patch would fix one of the many larger problems. > > > > > > > It helps with setting up logical replication among two or more nodes > > (data flows both ways) which is important for use cases where > > applications are data-aware. For such apps, it will be beneficial to > > That does make sense, thanks. Uh, thinking some more, why would anyone set things up this way --- having part of a table being primary on one server and a different part of the table be a subscriber. Seems it would be simpler and safer to create two child tables and have one be primary on only one server. Users can access both tables using the parent. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: