Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Yp1jUAVnyYfn80vu@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error
Re: BUG #17504: psql --single-transaction -vON_ERROR_STOP=1 still commits after client-side error |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 05:56:03PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > At Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:39:41 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in >> 001_basic.pl, but we also need to be careful when sending down queries >> with psql expected to fail because of SIGPIPE (c757a3d, 6d41dd0). The > > This does not need to send a byte after the client-side failure. The > connection is rather living after failure in this case. Sure, but I don't think that we can reliably test the case where one of the switches triggers a backend-side error, which is what my point is about. I have added a note about that, with a couple of extra tests with -f, with both success and failure scenarios. And we'd better add -X to all the commands as well. These are added only on HEAD as the test file is rather new. >> It causes psql to issue a BEGIN command before the first such option >> and a COMMIT command after the last one, thereby wrapping all the >> commands into a single transaction. >> If any of the commands fails, a ROLLBACK command is sent instead. >> This ensures that either all the commands complete successfully, or >> no changes are applied. Looks fine to me, so applied down to 10. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: