Re: PG15 beta1 fix pg_database view document
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG15 beta1 fix pg_database view document |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YosMqzLVj8X7XH9X@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PG15 beta1 fix pg_database view document ("Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG15 beta1 fix pg_database view document
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 02:00:18AM +0000, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) wrote: > Thanks to all the developers. The attached patch updates the manual > for the pg_database catalog. > The current pg_database view definition is missing the > datlocprovider column. The attached patch adds this column info. > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/catalog-pg-database.html Indeed. I have checked the rest of the catalog headers for any inconsistencies with the docs and what you have noticed here is the only one. + <structfield>datlocprovider</structfield> <type>char</type> + </para> + <para> + Provider of the collation for this database: <literal>c</literal> = libc, <literal>i</literal> = icu + </para></entry> ICU needs to be upper-case if you are referring to the library name. Here, my guess is that you are referring to the value that can be passed down to the command? You could use lower-case terms like on the CREATE COLLATION page, but I would put these within a <literal> markup. Anyway, this formulation is incorrect. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: