Re: make tuplestore helper function
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make tuplestore helper function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YhdrEloKNVwMPHrg@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make tuplestore helper function (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: make tuplestore helper function
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:41:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > So, I got my hands on this area, and found myself applying 07daca5 as > a first piece of the puzzle. Anyway, after more review today, I have > bumped into more pieces that could be consolidated, and finished with > the following patch set: > - 0001 changes a couple of SRFs that I found worth simplifying. These > refer mostly to the second and fourth group mentioned upthread by > Melanie, with two exceptions: pg_tablespace_databases() where it is > not worth changing to keep it backward-compatible and pg_ls_dir() as > per its one-arg version. That's a nice first cut in itself. > - 0002 changes a couple of places to unify some existing SRF checks, > that I bumped into on the way. The value here is in using the same > error messages everywhere, reducing the translation effort and > generating the same errors for all cases based on the same conditions. > This eases the review of the next patch. These two have been now applied, with some comment improvements and the cleanup of pg_options_to_table() done in 0001, and a slight change in 0002 for pageinspect where a check was not necessary for a BRIN code path. > - 0003 is the actual refactoring meat, where I have been able to move > the check on expectedDesc into MakeFuncResultTuplestore(), shaving > more code than previously. If you discard the cases of patch 0001, it > should actually be possible to set setResult, setDesc and returnMode > within the new function, which would feel natural as that's the place > where we create the function's tuplestore and we want to materialize > its contents. The cases with the JSON code are also a bit hairy and > need more thoughts, but we could also cut this part of the code from > the initial refactoring effort. This is the remaining piece, as attached, that I have not been able to poke much at yet. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: