Re: pg_upgrade verbosity when redirecting output to log file
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade verbosity when redirecting output to log file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YdxTyKo6zYxfq7HO@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade verbosity when redirecting output to log file (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade verbosity when redirecting output to log file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 10:39:58PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-01-10 01:14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > Fun! That seems to me to be a strong argument for not letting > > the behavior vary depending on isatty(). > > Yea. > > > > I think I'd vote for just nuking that output altogether. > > It seems of very dubious value. > > It seems worthwhile in some form - on large cluster in copy mode, the "Copying > user relation files" step can take *quite* a while, and even link/clone mode > aren't fast. But perhaps what'd be really needed is something counting up > actual progress in percentage of files and/or space... > > I think just coupling it to verbose mode makes the most sense, for now? All of this logging is from the stage where I was excited pg_upgrade worked, and I wanted to give clear output if it failed in some way --- printing the file names seems like an easy solution. I agree at this point that logging should be reduced, and if they want more logging, the verbose option is the right way to get it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: