Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | YdYx6+IrS0PtWIpr@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 ("Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 05:49:07PM +0000, Finnerty, Jim wrote: > Hi Maxim, > I’m glad to see that you’re trying to carry the 64-bit XID work forward. I > had not noticed that my earlier patch (also derived from Alexander Kortkov’s > patch) was responded to back in September. Perhaps we can merge some of the > code cleanup that it contained, such as using XID_FMT everywhere and creating a > type for the kind of page returned by TransactionIdToPage() to make the code > cleaner. > > Is your patch functionally the same as the PostgresPro implementation? If > so, I think it would be helpful for everyone’s understanding to read the > PostgresPro documentation on VACUUM. See in particular section “Forced > shrinking pg_clog and pg_multixact” > > https://postgrespro.com/docs/enterprise/9.6/routine-vacuuming# > vacuum-for-wraparound Good point --- we still need vacuum freeze. It would be good to understand how much value we get in allowing vacuum freeze to be done less often --- how big can pg_xact/pg_multixact get before they are problems? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: