Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Yalqgvj+JFdYS8pp@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:22:25PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > Since I have no further comments, I went ahead and marked this once as > ready-for-committer. Well, as you say, lazy_scan_heap() is only run once per relation, so that's not a hot code path. Looking at the callers of message_level_is_interesting(), we apply that also in areas where a lot of unnecessary work would be involved, like the drop of object dependencies or ProcSleep() (I recall that there were profiles where standby replies in walsender.c could show up). And based on the amount of unnecessary work done at the end of lazy_scan_heap(), I'd say that this is worth skipping, so let's do it. There is always the argument that one may blindly add some logic at the end of lazy_scan_heap(), causing it to be skipped depending on the configuration, but that's unlikely going to happen after the activity is logged, so I am fine to apply what you have here. Let's wait a bit to see if others have any objections, first. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: