Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YTW28YeDWWgW6o16@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> If DeleteFile() is automatically using > FILE_DISPOSITION_POSIX_SEMANTICS by default when possible on recent > releases as per the SO link that Andres posted above ("18363.657 > definitely has the new behavior"), then that's great news and maybe we > shouldn't even bother to try to request that mode ourselves explicitly > (eg in some kind of unlink wrapper). Then we'd need just one > accomodation for older systems and non-NTFS systems, not two, and I > currently think that should be the short and sweet approach shown in > 0001-Handle-STATUS_DELETE_PENDING-on-Windows.patch, with some tidying > and adjustments per feedback. Having a non-invasive fix for this long-standing issue would be really great, even if that means reducing the scope of systems where this can be fixed. The last time I poked at the bear (54fb8c7d), there was a test posted by Alexander Lakhin that was really useful in making sure that concurrency is correctly handled when a file is unlinked: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c3427edf-d7c0-ff57-90f6-b5de3bb62709@gmail.com It worked with VS but not on MinGW. How does your patch react to this test? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: