Re: Fixup some appendStringInfo and appendPQExpBuffer calls
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fixup some appendStringInfo and appendPQExpBuffer calls |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YLhF6FDIaRK9TWGV@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fixup some appendStringInfo and appendPQExpBuffer calls (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fixup some appendStringInfo and appendPQExpBuffer calls
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:53:34PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > I think it would be good to fix at least the instances that are new > code in PG14 before we branch for PG15. They all seem low enough risk > and worth keeping the new-to-PG14 code as close to the same as > possible between major versions. It seems more likely that newer code > will need bug fixes in the future so having the code as similar as > possible in each branch makes backpatching easier. > For the code that's not new to PG14, I feel less strongly about those. > In the patch there's just 2 instances of these; one in > contrib/sepgsql/schema.c and another in > src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c. I've tried to push for these > sorts of things to be fixed at around this time of year in the past, > but there have been other people thinking we should wait until we > branch. For example [1] and [2]. No objections to those arguments, makes sense. I don't see an issue with changing the new code before branching, FWIW. As you already did 110d817, perhaps you would prefer taking care of it? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: