Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YFRfD6h+iosaiQY7@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:14:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Looking at 0001, I am not much a fan of relying on the position of the > matching pattern in the log file. Instead of relying on the logging > collector and one single file, why not just changing the generation of > the logfile and rely on the output of stderr by restarting the server? > That means less tests, no need to wait for the logging collector to do > its business, and it solves your problem. Please see the idea with > the patch attached. Thoughts? While looking at 0003, I have noticed that the new kerberos tests actually switch from a logic where one message pattern matches, to a logic where multiple message patterns match, but I don't see a problem with what I sent previously, as long as one consume once a log file and matches all the patterns once, say like the following in test_access(): my $first_logfile = slurp_file($node->logfile); # Verify specified log messages are logged in the log file. while (my $expect_log_msg = shift @expect_log_msgs) { like($first_logfile, qr/\Q$expect_log_msg\E/, 'found expected log file content'); } # Rotate to a new file, for any next check. $node->rotate_logfile; $node->restart; A second solution would be a logrotate, relying on the contents of current_logfiles to know what is the current file, with an extra wait after $node->logrotate to check if the contents of current_logfiles have changed. That's slower for me as this requires a small sleep to make sure that the new log file name has changed, and I find the restart solution simpler and more elegant. Please see the attached based on HEAD for this logrotate idea. Jacob, what do you think? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: