Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:33:57AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 15:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:50:05PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 16:23 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to document when partition table statistics helps?
> > > 
> > > I think it would be difficult to come up with an exhaustive list.
> > 
> > I was afraid of that.  I asked only because most people assume
> > autovacuum handles _all_ statistics needs, but this case is not handled.
> > Do people even have any statistics maintenance process anymore, and if
> > not, how would they know they need to run a manual ANALYZE?
> 
> Probably not.  I think this would warrant an entry in the TODO list:
> "make autovacuum collect startistics for partitioned tables".

We have it already:

    Have autoanalyze of parent tables occur when child tables are modified

> Even if we cannot give better advice than "run ALANYZE manually if
> the execution plan looks fishy", the patch is still an improvement,
> isn't it?

Yes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

Embrace your flaws.  They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.