Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Y30PhK8aiSPqyAQL@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:35:09AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > Agreed on not using "unaborted", per previous discussion. > > On 2022-Nov-21, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > Perhaps we should also avoid the term "transaction block". Even without speaking > > of a "block", way too many people confuse PL/pgSQL's BEGIN ... END blocks > > with transactions. On the other hand, we use "transaction block" everywhere > > else in the documentation... > > Yeah, I don't understand why we need this "transaction block" term at > all. It adds nothing. We could just use the term "transaction", and > little meaning would be lost. When necessary, we could just say > "explicit transaction" or something to that effect. In this particular > case, we could modify your proposed wording, Yes, I just posted that same thing: Transactions can be created explicitly using > > <para> > > Multi-statement transactions can be created explicitly using > > <command>BEGIN</command> or <command>START TRANSACTION</command> and > > are ended using <command>COMMIT</command> or <command>ROLLBACK</command>. > > An SQL statement outside of a transaction block automatically uses > > a single-statement transaction. > > </para> > > by removing the word "block": > > > Any SQL statement outside of an transaction automatically uses > > a single-statement transaction. > > and perhaps add "explicit", but I don't think it's necessary: > > > Any SQL statement outside of an explicit transaction automatically > > uses a single-statement transaction. Full paragraph is now: Transactions can be created explicitly using <command>BEGIN</command> or <command>START TRANSACTION</command> and ended using <command>COMMIT</command> or <command>ROLLBACK</command>. An SQL statement outside of an explicit transaction automatically uses a single-statement transaction. > (I also changed "An" to "Any" because it seems more natural, but I > suppose it's a stylistic choice.) I think we have a plurality mismatch so I went with "SQL statements" and didn't need "an" or "any" (even newer paragraph version): Transactions can be created explicitly using <command>BEGIN</command> or <command>START TRANSACTION</command> and ended using <command>COMMIT</command> or <command>ROLLBACK</command>. SQL statements outside of explicit transactions automatically use single-statement transactions. Updated patch attached. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: