Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Y0j/TFm806nLxD4g@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 02:30:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > First, as of HEAD, AuthToken is only used for elements in a list of > role and database names in hba.conf before filling in each HbaLine, > hence we limit its usage to the initial parsing. The patch assigns an > optional regex_t to it, then extends the use of AuthToken for single > hostname entries in pg_hba.conf. Things going first: shouldn't we > combine ident_user and "re" together in the same structure? Even if > we finish by not using AuthToken to store the computed regex, it seems > to me that we'd better use the same base structure for pg_ident.conf > and pg_hba.conf. While looking closely at the patch, we would expand > the use of AuthToken outside its original context. I have also looked > at make_auth_token(), and wondered if it could be possible to have this > routine compile the regexes. This approach would not stick with > pg_ident.conf though, as we validate the fields in each line when we > put our hands on ident_user and after the base validation of a line > (number of fields, etc.). So with all that in mind, it feels right to > not use AuthToken at all when building each HbaLine and each > IdentLine, but a new, separate, structure. We could call that an > AuthItem (string, its compiled regex) perhaps? It could have its own > make() routine, taking in input an AuthToken and process > pg_regcomp(). Better ideas for this new structure would be welcome, > and the idea is that we'd store the post-parsing state of an > AuthToken to something that has a compiled regex. We could finish by > using AuthToken at the end and expand its use, but it does not feel > completely right either to have a make() routine but not be able to > compile its regular expression when creating the AuthToken. I have have sent this part too quickly. As AuthTokens are used in check_db() and check_role() when matching entries, it is more intuitive to store the regex_t directly in it. Changing IdentLine to use a AuthToken makes the "quoted" part useless in this case, still it could be used in Assert()s to make sure that the data is shaped as expected at check-time, enforced at false when creating it in parse_ident_line()? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: