Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Randolf Richardson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Xns95D8C5C3CEC15rr8xca@200.46.204.72 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (ycrevecoeur@nyc.rr.com) |
Список | pgsql-benchmarks |
"ycrevecoeur@nyc.rr.com" wrote in pgsql.benchmarks: [sNip] > It really depends on the job at hand. > > If this is for a super critical environment and the database is gonna > get pounded really hard then go with Oracle if you have the budget > otherwise PostgreSQL should do fine although Microsoft has nice > development tools. Unfortunately "nice development tools" has absolutely nothing to do with "super critical" and "gonna get pounded really hard." And with regards to the development tools, I actually find the Microsoft tools not to my liking because they tend to keep the developer from knowing what's really going on "under the hood" -- my preference is a straight text editor to edit the source, compile/make, then see the results (and only get into debugging as needed), thus fancy development tools are mostly a waste of time for me (I'm happy with my text editor called "MEd"). > http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743 I'll take a look at that. Thanks for the link.
В списке pgsql-benchmarks по дате отправления: