Re: [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...
От | Woodchuck Bill |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Xns95B1C3BCEAE12bswr607h4@130.133.1.4 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Marc G. Fournier From: <scrappy@hub.org> wrote in news:coj22u$2h1j$2@news.hub.org: > barbara@bookpro.com writes: > >>On 30 Nov 2004 22:55:00 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com> >>wrote: > >>>Marc G. Fournier From: <scrappy@hub.org> wrote in >>>news:coi503$28u4$1@news.hub.org: >>> >>>> Just as an FYI ... the latest RFD is for *one* >>>> comp.databases.postgresql group to be created, that is not-gated ... >>>> this means that those using it would not have the benefit(s) that >>>> those using the pgsql.* hierarchy do, namely access to the wealth of >>>> knowledge/experience of those on the mailing lists ... >>>> >>>> I had posed the 'who would use USENET' question on -hackers previous >>>> to the poll, and the general opinion was "not in this life time" by >>>> ppl like PeterE, TomL, JoshuaD, etc ... the thread can be seen: >>>> >>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg01110.php >>> >>>Trying to sway the vote? > >>There has been no CFV. During an RFD, he's completely entitled to try >>to persuade others people to vote yes or no when the time comes. > >>Bill, is it possible for you to drop the combative tone? It's not >>that helpful to constantly raise the temperature of the discussion. > > Actually, I didn't find Bill's comment 'combative' ... :) Nor was it intended to be that way. :-) -- Bill
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: