Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ...
От | Woodchuck Bill |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Xns95AAA7ACB1613bswr607h4@130.133.1.4 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... (jseymour@linxnet.com (Jim Seymour)) |
Список | pgsql-general |
gburnore@databasix.com ("Gary L. Burnore") wrote in news:6.1.1.1.2.20041123160436.03a25748@popd.databasix.com: > At 03:44 PM 11/23/2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>>Did you warn the proponent of comp.databases.postgresql.* that you >>>were going to do this? Did you read any of the arguments for and >>>against a completely separate hierarchy that were posted to the RFD >>>thread in news.groups? >> >>Interesting point. What did come of all the arguments? These news >>server changes seem to be fairly arbitrary and one lined. Perhaps this >>should be taken up as a whole? > > Setting this up outside of the comp. groups tells everyone you want to > be more like microsoft.* and less like major databases. Moreover, it > means less propagation since not all servers will carry them. And if he plans on having *2* newsgroups for each list (one in comp.* and one in pgsql.*) then the credibility of his hierarchy will go further down the drain. > So much for working out the problems. No further comment. -- Bill
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: