Re: [HACKERS] Threads
От | Dmitry Samersoff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Threads |
Дата | |
Msg-id | XFMail.990803183757.dms@wplus.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Threads (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03-Aug-99 Thomas Lockhart wrote: >> As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading. >> Any thoughts? I completly agree with Thomas. Mutiprocess server is also more convenient for managing and more portable > > Threads within a client backend might be interesting. imho a > single-process multi-client multi-threaded server is just asking for > trouble, putting all clients at risk for any single misbehaving one. > Particularly with our extensibility features, where users and admins > can add functionality through code they have written (or are trying to > write ;) having each backend isolated is A Good Thing. > > istm that many of the cases for which multi-threading is proposed (web > serving always comes up) can be solved using persistant connections or > other techniques. > > - Thomas > > -- > Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu > South Pasadena, California --- Dmitry Samersoff, dms@wplus.net, ICQ:3161705 http://devnull.wplus.net * There will come soft rains ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: