Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
От | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | XFMail.990604114906.vev@michvhf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04-Jun-99 Tom Lane wrote: > However, I am loathe to put *any* work into improving LOs, since I think > the right answer is to get rid of the need for the durn things by > eliminating the size restrictions on regular tuples. Is this doable? I just looked at the list of datatypes and didn't see binary as one of them. Imagining a Real Estate database with pictures of homes (inside and out), etc. or an employee database with mugshots of the employees, what datatype would you use to store the pictures (short of just storing a filename of the pic)? Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2 Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: