Re: j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org?
От | Ned Wolpert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | XFMail.20011029105520.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org? (Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29-Oct-2001 Gunnar R�nning wrote: > Well, it used to be right(I evaluated castor 1.5 years ago). The main author > of Castor definitely had a patched version of pgsql version that were pending > inclusion at the time. Yes, that's true. But the patched version of the JDBC driver was because of bugs that caused Castor problems. The patches I submitted awhile back to the JDBC list (that are in 7.2b1) are the ones they used to create that version. Castor works with 7.1 and above, but until 7.2b1, they needed their 'fixed' JDBC driver. In fact, one of my goals has been to get Castor not having to distribute a patched version of the JDBC driver. The other is to help postgresql support the RETURNING clause. (So, we can do something like "insert into table person('name') values('fred') returning id" which would help sequence numbers within Castor, and be really cool. :-) Virtually, Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE73ZgIiysnOdCML0URAsPyAJoD9Yqn9q7IhjUIhlKDzCpy1hDpuQCdEWpm uHl0K85TVRvtDJ7Yo6vjrLY= =6foS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: