Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...
От | Ned Wolpert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | XFMail.20010821173602.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so you're not opposed to the idea then, just the syntax. Does anyone oppose having this concept in the JDBC driver? And what syntax is acceptable? Could we just do 'select getInsertedOID()' which would break people who have functions called getInsertedOID() of course... On 21-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote: > Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com> writes: >> What about the 'select @@last_oid' to make the getInsertedOID() call >> available even when the driver is wrapped by a pooling manager? > >> How do people feel about this? > > Yech. At least, not with *that* syntax. @@ is a valid operator name > in Postgres. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html Virtually, Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7gv5yiysnOdCML0URAq7qAJkBRhAcE9wctn7bUAv7UMwN3n9+nwCeJR4V ymYTw8l3f9WU4V5idFsibAE= =UQ2M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: