Re: BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | X+BLDQOGr4V5oeBz@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:00:00AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > So on Windows the recovery_target_xid parameter doesn't accept 64-bit > value. > As I see in check_recovery_target_xid() the strtoul() function is used to > check/convert the input value, that is later stored into 32-bit variable. > Thus, on platforms where unsigned long is 32-bit wide, you can't specify a > result of pg_current_xact_id() as recovery_target_xid, while on platforms > where unsigned long is 64-bit, you can, but high 32 bits are just ignored. In order to make the experience consistent across all platforms, we can use pg_strtouint64() for the GUC parsing. I agree that ignoring the high bits can be confusing as recovery would stop once a XID matches with a modulo of UINT32_MAX, but beginning to issue an error on platforms where unsigned long is 8 bytes could also break existing tools. At the same time, WAL record headers and 2PC state data only use 32-bit XIDs, so ignoring the high bits changes nothing at recovery (XIDs don't go across more than one epoch in the WAL stream AFAIK). In short, I agree that there is room for improvement here and that we should just allow the case to work by replacing the use of strtoul() to pg_strtouint64(). I am ready to bet that a lot of users setting a target XID rely on the return result of txid_current() or pg_current_xact_id() similarly to the test failing here. And once the epoch increments, the problems begin. Thoughts? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: