RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
От | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TYAPR01MB586641134EF13CBF74F5746FF59A9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Peter, Thank you for giving explanation. > > Hopefully, someone will correct me if this explanation is wrong, but > my understanding of the different prefixes is like this -- > > "XXX" is used as a marker for future developers to consider maybe > revisiting/improving something that the comment refers to > e.g. > /* XXX - it would be better to code this using blah but for now we did > not.... */ > /* XXX - option 'foo' is not currently supported but... */ > /* XXX - it might be worth considering adding more checks or an assert > here because... */ > > OTOH, "Note" is just for highlighting why something is the way it is, > but with no implication that it should be revisited/changed in the > future. > e.g. > /* Note: We deliberately do not test the state here because... */ > /* Note: This memory must be zeroed because... */ > /* Note: This string has no '\0' terminator so... */ I confirmed that current "XXX" comments must be removed by improving or some decision. Therefore I kept current annotation. Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: