RE: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
От | Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TYAPR01MB30884712D2366CF5F693529095F92@TYAPR01MB3088.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() (Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi. Tender. Thank you for modification. > From: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 7:51 PM > Please add more tests. Especially please add some negative tests; > current patch checks that it is safe to apply materialization. It would > be helpful to add tests checking that materialization is not applied > in both checked cases: > 1. when inner join path is not parallel safe > 2. when matpath is not parallel safe > > > > I added a test case that inner rel is not parallel safe. Actually, > matpath will not create if inner rel is not parallel safe. So I didn't add test case for the second scenario. Is there case in which matpath is not parallel safe and inner rel is parallel safe? If right, I think that it would be suitable to add a negative test in a such case. Sincerely yours, Yuuki Fujii -- Yuuki Fujii Information Technology R&D Center Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: