RE: libpq debug log
От | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: libpq debug log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TYAPR01MB2990FA689A57272C96948207FEB39@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq debug log (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> > I'm pretty sure I named the flag PQTRACE_SUPPRESS_TIMESTAMP (and I > prefer SUPPRESS to NOOUTPUT), because the idea is that the timestamp is > printed by default. I think that's the sensible decision: applications > prefer to have timestamps, even if there's a tiny bit of overhead. We > don't want to force them to pass a flag for that. We only want the > no-timestamp behavior in order to be able to use it for libpq internal > testing. Agreed. It makes sense to print timestamps by default because this feature will be used to diagnose slowness outside thedatabase server. (I misunderstood the motivation to introduce the flag). Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: