RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
От | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TYAPR01MB29905FFCBEBF17AC5D35B03EFE229@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> > I'm still not sure why the execution time with 0 workers (or serial execution or > no parallelism involved) on my testing system is 112 sec compared to 58 sec on > Hou-San's system for the same use case. Maybe the testing system I'm using > is not of the latest configuration compared to others. What's the setting of wal_level on your two's systems? I thought it could be that you set it to > minimal, while Hou-sanset it to minimal. (I forgot the results of 2 and 4 workers, though.) Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: