RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com
Тема RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Дата
Msg-id TYAPR01MB2990390CF2456EB228EF5A54FE469@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
From: Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> I agree that it's better to mark the function with correct parallel safety lable.
> Especially for the above functions which will be executed in parallel mode.
> It will be friendly to developer and user who is working on something related to
> parallel test.
>
> So, I attached the patch to mark the above functions parallel safe.

Thank you, the patch looks good.  Please register it with the next CF if not yet.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ian Zagorskikh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq compression
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings