RE: Global snapshots
От | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Global snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TYAPR01MB29902D8B671A5A6946F5AEA8FE720@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Global snapshots ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Global snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrey san, Movead san, From: tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> > While Clock-SI seems to be considered the best promising for global > serializability here, > > * Why does Clock-SI gets so much attention? How did Clock-SI become the > only choice? > > * Clock-SI was devised in Microsoft Research. Does Microsoft or some other > organization use Clock-SI? Could you take a look at this patent? I'm afraid this is the Clock-SI for MVCC. Microsoft holds this until 2031. I couldn'tfind this with the keyword "Clock-SI."" US8356007B2 - Distributed transaction management for database systems with multiversioning - Google Patents https://patents.google.com/patent/US8356007 If it is, can we circumvent this patent? Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: