Re: Issue in autovacuum
От | Agarwal, Prateek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue in autovacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TU4PR84MB02562A3EBDA7DC0D57258F47D5340@TU4PR84MB0256.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue in autovacuum (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for your responses! We are not using prepared transactions and not using replication slots as well. We do have a lot of transactions getting created and closed on account of executing the update queries. Thanks, Prateek -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:54 PM To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> Cc: Agarwal, Prateek <prateeka@hpe.com>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Issue in autovacuum Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > On 03/28/2017 03:15 AM, Agarwal, Prateek wrote: >> When I upgrade my db to 9.4.6 (my application remains same and hardly >> any code change w.r.t transaction declarations), it started >> complaining about dead rows below. I am not sure if it is something >> to do with upgrade or not. > So are you using replication slots? Or prepared transactions? Or maybe you just have a really old open transaction? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: