RE: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
От | Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | TU4PR8401MB115291AE850BA7CF1AEB2F0BEEDD0@TU4PR8401MB1152.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Sorry this email is not a discussion about word selection. Since part of the manual had left pg_validatebackup in commit dbc60c5593f26dc777a3be032bff4fb4eab1ddd1. I've attached a patch to fix this. Regards, Noriyoshi Shinoda -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 5:07 AM To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>; Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>; Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>;David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2020-04-12 11:21:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> We could also have an alternate name, like pgsql, and make 'pg' a >> symlink to it that packagers can choose to omit. > We could even name the non-abbreviated binary postgres :). I shudder to imagine the confusion that would result. regards, tom lane
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: