RE: Query execution failure
От | Pete Storer |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Query execution failure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | SN6PR05MB6637045A3875380FFE2399D3F3D39@SN6PR05MB6637.namprd05.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query execution failure (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query execution failure
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Makes sense - but I'm using the PG substring function here. LEFT OUTER JOIN main.ship_event se ON (se.ship_event_nm = substring(dp.shipevent from 6 for 5)) In this case, the dp.shipevent is in the fdw-accessed MySql table. Shouldn't that force the sort to be local? -----Original Message----- From: Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 1:20 PM To: Pete Storer <Pete.Storer@sas.com> Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>; Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Query execution failure [You don't often get email from xof@thebuild.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification] EXTERNAL > On Jan 30, 2023, at 10:17, Pete Storer <Pete.Storer@sas.com> wrote: > > This is very interesting, guys. And it leads me to a question: Is there any way to FORCE Postgres to do a local sort/collationof any data that is accessed through a FDW? It depends on the FDW. One thing to try is to have the SORT be an expression, especially one that depends on functions thatcan't otherwise be pushed down. (You may have to do some experimenting to find one that returns identity, i.e. the samesort order as just the bare column, but isn't pushed down.)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: