Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
| От | Evan Rempel |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Which platfform do you recommend? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.WNT.4.44.0410150949070.2412-100000@dback.comp.uvic.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Which platfform do you recommend? (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Do you have a reference for the post that Chris Browne made? I would be very interested to see the performance differences for the different filesystems. Evan. On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:33:39 -0400 > From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> > To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Which platfform do you recommend? > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:38:45AM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > > > For Linux, ext3 seems better, but under some circumstances ext2 could run > > more stable. Check pgsql-perform list archives for more discussions on > > filesystems on Linux. > > Some time ago, Chris Browne posted some test results he did. It > turned out that jfs beat xfs, and that either of them completely > trounced both reiser and ext3. In particular, ext3 was just plain > slow. We won't consider ext2 because it's too dangerous in case of > crash. > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca > In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant- > garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. > --Brad Holland > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -- Evan Rempel erempel@uvic.ca Senior Programmer Analyst 250.721.7691 Computing Services University of Victoria
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: