Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend]
От | J. Michael Roberts |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SV4.3.96.980921105021.19373A-100000@school.cs.indiana.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yeek. Some hackles seem to getting raised. I am one of the people who support a more stringent regression test. Bruce, I don't think anyone in their right mind could possibly accuse you of doing less than a superhuman job here. So I think there's no need for you to react defensively. But the fact remains that I, for one, am not going to recommend PG for any app that I'm not going to check myself on a daily basis. Not when normal queries like the one that started this mess can cause crashes that will never be detected, even if they always did do that. And yes, there has been support from the peanut gallery, as I think Tom pointed out, and no, nobody's asked for money. And yes, the "big guys" can be far more cavalier about saying "Oh, yes, we knew about that problem, it'll be fixed in the next release hopefully." But what we're really proposing is better documentation of known bugs, and the construction of a test suite that will not only check basic functionality, but everything anyone can think of that could be considered sort of normal usage, and we certainly all have different ideas about what is "normal." This, no matter what changes are made, we know where we stand. That's all that has been said. The idea of separating a more complete "stability test" from the present development-time "regression" test, I think, is a valid one. By the way, can anyone tell me why it's called a regression test? What are we regressing from, or are we regretting having tested? OK, OK, just a little humor. I am perfectly willing to organize a stability test, and I am also more than willing to start improving the documentation because I've got to anyway to get this beast working well under Windows -- but I'm not ready yet, because of that damnable requirement of keeping the family fed and the bank from repossessing the house. Towards the end of the year, I hope that the curve will take me back towards free time, and then we'll see where we stand. In the meantime, I would hope that all the people doing this incredible work don't take all this amiss. You really are doing a bang-up job. Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: