Re: Where `gcc -MMD' puts .d files

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have a patch for (better) dependency tracking with gcc >= 3 which will
> hit CVS soon.  Until then, use released compilers or don't use dependency
> tracking. :-( (The last couple of times I tried gcc >= 3 with PostgreSQL
> it was a complete disaster anyway, so the former is a good idea in any
> case ;-).)
The point is that I do use gcc 2.95.2, and it puts .d file in the curent
directory, not to the directory there files come from. Anyway, my patch
solve the problem at least for me.

Regards,
ASK