Re: Ultrix port
От | Alexander Klimov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ultrix port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SUN.4.21.0103291112340.13745-100000@dardar.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ultrix port (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Klimov <ask@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> writes: > > First problem is sys/socket.h. Here it has no guards in it (like > > #ifdef _SOCKET_H > > #endif), so it could not be included twice, and I have to remove its > > unnecesarry inclusions. > > Are you sure these are unnecessary? What are the odds this patch will > break other platforms? I almost shure it is not, because sys/socket.h already included in each of the files but indirectly, thru libpq-be -> pqcomm, that include it on non windows platforms. My guess is that tracking and elimination of double includes of the same file is useful in general, because it at least decrease compilation time. Regards, ASK
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: