Re: your mail
От | Oleg Broytmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: your mail |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990211190033.948A-100000@sun.med.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail
Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi! On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Angelos Karageorgiou wrote: > > For me it seems like a compiler (or compiler option) problem - signed > > vs. unsigned chars. > > Yes you are right , the problem is BSD/OS specific , and indeed it has to > do with unsigned chars vs signed chars. I just did not know if others had > the problem too and since and a cast to (unsigned char) has no effect to > an 8bit char I decided to post the patch. > > Even test-ctype gives out different results when cp is cast as unsigned > chat and not a plain char. would you like the output from test-ctype for > unsigned chars ? I am not sure. This should be discussed among other developers. What we should use: signed or unsigned chars, anyone has an idea? > BTW i appreciate the work on postgres it is an awesome package Welcome! Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2@earthling.net Programmers don't die, they justGOSUB without RETURN.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: