Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file
От | Scott Tomer x6214 Austin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SOL.3.96.980417215450.14484A-100000@shasta.bmc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file ("Julia A.Case" <julie@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file
Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 julie@hub.org wrote: > The last time I made mumblings of droping 16 bit support I got > roasted pretty good. There seem to still be a lot of 16 bit users out > there that would like to use the driver. > > Julie Could someone forward this to the old list; I'm sorry that I do not remember the address. It is just that I know not all members of the old PostODBC list have migrated to this one, and there may be many of those that have viewpoints on this issue. I, myself, would not have a problem with dropping 16bit; however, I realize not all have windoze users have buckled under the enourmous pressure from MS to convert to 95. Scott
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: