Re: [GENERAL] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:56:12 +0200
От | Dustin Sallings |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:56:12 +0200 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SGI.3.95.990626200021.3570A-100000@bleu.west.spy.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:56:12 +0200 (Jim Jennis <jhjennis@shentel.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Jim Jennis wrote: # Not only legacy apps, but data warehousing. Frequently in a production # environment you use two sets of tables -- production and data # warehousing...One (production) with "bare bones" indicies to maximize # transaction performance, and one (a replicate in the data warehouse) # that you "index the living daylights out of" so that the non db saavy # managers who want to do ungodly joints and sorts on tables for # organizational reporting get decent performance. Creating lots of indices is far different from creating a single index on a lot of fields. Data warehousing is the former. The problem is that you can't create a single index with a large number of fields. -- SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: