Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres
От | Dustin Sallings |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SGI.3.95.990426112052.13754D-100000@bleu.west.spy.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres (Chris Bitmead <chris.bitmead@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Bitmead wrote: # > IDE is just plain slow on Unix. Unix does much better with SCSI, # > especially when there are multiple disks. # # Oh I don't know. If you've only got 1 or 2 disks you may find IDE # sufficient. (well it works nicely for me.) Works != works as well as SCSI. I've yet to find an example where IDE works as well as SCSI in real life (vs. benchmarks). My real life scenarios rarely involve telling a machine to be still so we can do a disk read, then again for a disk write. # People have been commenting lately that postgres on Solaris is very slow # compared to Linux. Apparently certain file system operations on Solaris # is _slow_. Slow, however more robust than the same in Linux. Linux achieves a lot of speed by throwing away safety nets. Sometimes, these safety nets are important. -- SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: