Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.OSF.4.61.0606241536290.44498@kosh.hut.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Mark Woodward wrote: > I'm probably mistaken, but aren't there already forward references in > tuples to later versions? If so, I'm only sugesting reversing the order > and referencing the latest version. I thought I understood your idea, but now you lost me again. I thought what you want is that the older heap tuple has a pointer to the newer one. Which it already has, it's called t_ctid. Can you try to explain more carefully how the whole thing would work? What would an index tuple point to? What pointers would a heap tuple have? What would an index scan do to find the row version it's interested in? What exactly would an update do? - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: