Re: Dead Space Map
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dead Space Map |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.OSF.4.61.0602281937440.76425@kosh.hut.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dead Space Map (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dead Space Map
Re: Dead Space Map |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> MVCC goes out the window, eh? Not to mention transaction rollback ability? >> >>> If the old row is not visible to any transactions, why would it not work? >> >> The old row is ALWAYS visible to somebody, until you commit (if you ever >> do). You can't simply overwrite existing data. > > Huh, I am not suggesting overwriting tuples you created, but tuples > created by earlier transactions and now invisible to everyone. > > I should be clearer. Suppose you have a table with a single index on > the primary key. You are updating the row over and over again (a > typical case). You create the first row, commit, then it is updated > (two copies), commit, then you update it again. That first created row > might not be visible to anyone, but has the same index value as the new > row you are about to add. Why not reused that heap tuple? Index tuples have commit info hint bits in them, don't they? You would still have to update those. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: