Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX
| От | Pedro J. Lobo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.OSF.3.96.980305100922.18067A-100000@haddock.euitt.upm.es обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> ERROR: BuildFuncTupleDesc: function mkoidname(opaque, opaque) does not
>> exist
>> ERROR: BuildFuncTupleDesc: function mkoidname(opaque, opaque) does not
>> exist
>> longjmp or siglongjmp function used outside of saved context
>> /cec/scratch/cecweb/postgresql/bin/initdb: 10890 Abort - core dumped
>
>Known bug. We can't get Alpha working on 6.3.
>
>Let me mention on thing that may help the alpha developers trying to fix
>this.
>
>As part of 6.3 changes, I changed some contants in
>/src/include/catalog/*.h that used 0L to just plain 0. It seemed to be
>done inconsistently, and I could not figure out how the 0L could be
>different than 0.
>
>Can someone take a look at the 6.2 source and 6.3 source, and tell me if
>the 0L entries in 6.2 change the alpha behavior from a plain 0. Perhaps
>a way of testing would be to replace the 0L with 0 in a working 6.2, and
>run initdb to see if the system still works.
:-? I've looked at both 6.2.1 and 6.3 and have been unable to find a
single '0L' in either version. I've looked in all .h files in src/include,
not just src/include/catalog.
Pedro.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro José Lobo Perea Tel: +34 1 336 78 19
Centro de Cálculo Fax: +34 1 331 92 29
EUIT Telecomunicación - UPM e-mail: pjlobo@euitt.upm.es
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: