Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.58.0410261502510.13312@angelic-vtfw.cvpn.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Greg Stark wrote: > I see mmap or O_DIRECT being the only viable long-term stable states. My > natural inclination was the former but after the latest thread on the subject > I suspect it'll be forever out of reach. That makes O_DIRECT And a Postgres > managed cache the only real choice. Having both caches is just a waste of > memory and a waste of cpu cycles. I don't see why mmap is any more out of reach than O_DIRECT; it's not all that much harder to implement, and mmap (and madvise!) is more widely available. But if using two caches is only costing us 1% in performance, there's not really much point.... cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.NetBSD.org Make up enjoying your city life...produced byBIC CAMERA
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: